EPUB Time and Philosophy – mymaxlinks.us
E than mildly interesting i o not know many of the recent thinkers i am stimulated to look again at some works try some but then this is in the interests of intellectual fun and no i like to read this sort of philosophy not logic obsessed analytic work as reminds me of reading math McCumber s project is an ambitious one to provide a historical and intellectual account of continental philosophy and give notes on its Enticing (PI Men to the Rescue development through time Any of the subsections in the book could have been full fledgedoctoral Spring Comes to Sanctuary (Welcome to Sanctuary, dissertations given the content and many certainly have been I m not generally a fan of these sorts of broad projects because they try too far too much and often end up shirking many of their subjects McCumber Ask the Past does a great job at staying faithful to many of his subjects though heoes have to be brief in some of his accounting for the thought given the page length but he oes a good job at Keeping His Focus And Moving Through An Enormous Amount Of his focus and moving through an enormous amount of contentThe book is long and sometimes tedious McCumber is never redundant but he oes hit his central themes fairly hard and some of the things that he addresses are not really Silver Stirrups (Saddle Club, developed as much as reiterated through the book What he means when he talks about temporalityoesn t reiterated through the book What he means when he talks about temporality Different Class doesn t enoughevelopment and becomes the central flag of the book and could probably Short Stories by Roald Dahl do to be a bit interesting He spends a lot of time exploring the temporality of the thinkers and not a lot of timeeveloping the concept of temporality properAt any rate to those interested in an interesting perspective on continental thought I Goldilocks the Three Bears do recommend it McCumber is thorough and thoughtful and very honest perhaps one of the most refreshing feature of the book is his willingness to acknowledge lapses in judgement in historical features instead of attempting the appearance of being unbiased whatever that is supposed to mean He provides a good narration of some of theifficult thinkers in the recent history of philosophy and oes a fair job at contextualizing an oft written about but poorly understood movement in philosophy. Idate the primary texts for readers coming to these thinkers for the first time while revealing the philosophical rigour that underpins and connects the history of continental thoug.
Read Time and PhilosophySehr gut Tres bien Should ve read along time ago Would have saved me trouble It s ifficult for me to express how much I appreciate the work McCumber has put into this book Trying to run a common thread time through the big players of continental philosophy is a very Socialist Realism difficult task hell just summarizing these philosophers alone is something that seems impossible McCumber s book however succeeds in building a chronological account of how each philosopher builds on the previous one They can be understood broadly by how theyealt with the relationship between the temporal and the idealThe book serves as a ense introduction and a big picture view of how the continental philosophers relate to one another I had to reread certain sections and take lots of notes but McCumber s book is super helpful overall My only complaint is that the chapter on Derrida is A Little Weak I Was Expecting A Thorough Treatment Of little weak I was expecting a thorough treatment of s Of Grammatology but was surprised that McCumber focuses on The book characterizes continental philosophy as temporal thinking which is illuminating One may wonder however whether it is still meaningful to call this way of philosophizing continental would Hegel consider himself continental To me it seems that the tag is part of the colonial project of analytic philosophy which insists its own privilege to a basic method analysis while rendering whatever it islikes something regional I see this book as effectively collaborating with the projectThe author has many insights but is clearly unprofessional in the theme of the book His interpretation of Kant follows an outdated model once endorsed
by marburg neoMarburg Neo He considers Husserl s project one that revives traditional ie atemporal thinking because he totally misses recent research based on Husserl s manuscripts He talks about Sartre s Existentialism is a Humanism a piece Sartre himself isowned as if it were compatible with Being and Nothingness and throughout the book he misspelled the name of the book as Being and Nothing The lack of professionalism is also shown in the casualty Looking at the evelopment of continental philosophy in both Europe and America McCumber iscusses philosophers ranging from Hegel Marx Kierkegaard Nietzsche Husserl Heidegger Arend. .
F bibliography the college teacher style of And The Inability To Recognize The the inability to recognize the of the isputesIt could have been a promising project to interpret phenomenological and existential philosophy as a way of thinking that takes time seriously However the author fails the expectation His conception of time remains superficial as if it sufficed to consider truth as historical and context ependent AND TO ANALYZE WHETHER AND HOW THE PAST DETERMINES to analyze whether and how the past etermines future This is based on a chronological notion of time which is predominant in our age but only Feminism is for Everybody derivative from an ontological point of view Even with the limited span of texts he had at hand the author could haveone better had he read carefully and exchanged his ideas with a real philosopher before writing a whole book As it now stands the book shows the ambition to tie together philosophers varying from Hegel to Butler while in fact only presents Deterring Democracy disparate surveys of the surfaces of their thought This is a great primer on continental thought Iidn t mind the lack of Habermas who needs that modern suare anyway The best part of this book is the introduction to each thinker via a usually comical story about their wacky character or social failures The chapter on Hannah Ardent is one of the best and most important It has sadly been ignored by most reviewers If you re passionate about philosophy but Comet in Moominland (The Moomins, don t have the money for a mastersegree read this book 130316 this is best read after the subtitle as it is not any specific continental theory of time but how various thinkers of said tradition all are influenced and influence in turn that aspect of thought called time it is therefore sort of a useful primer resource reminder of how a everything is in time and b philosophers must never forget a and whether such assertion has metaphysical value or correct practical valueperhaps this text could be used for class but it helps me at least to have read the works cited i Hunters Heart do not know how complete is this selection very little bergson io not know if the biographical snippets that start each chapter ar. T Adorno and Horkheimer Sartre e Beauvoir Foucault and Derrida to the most influential thinkers of today Agamben Badiou Bulter and Ranciere Throughout McCumber's concern is to eluc. .